How do you test for catastrophic forgetting after fine-tuning?
A higher overall score can hide the loss of familiar capabilities. Use a paired retention test to decide whether a fine-tuned model is ready.
Nodus blog
Guides, prices and benchmarks for training, inference and coding agents, from the people building Nodus.
fine-tuning6 min read
A higher overall score can hide the loss of familiar capabilities. Use a paired retention test to decide whether a fine-tuned model is ready.
Read the postcapacity6 min read
Compare Nodus and AWS SageMaker for training: checkpoint ownership, total run cost, migration work and when staying in AWS makes more sense.
Read the postfine-tuning5 min read
A random row split can put the same question in training and validation. Choose the holdout unit that matches the claim you want to test.
Read the postagents6 min read
A higher agent pass rate can hide fewer completed tasks. Compare scored pass rate, scoring coverage and confirmed successes before ranking two evaluations.
Read the postagents7 min read
Name the model, data, stop rule, dollar cap and outputs in one prompt, and Claude Code can fine-tune on a cloud GPU. The prompt, the manifest and what to check.
Read the postsandboxes8 min read
Nodus vs E2B for AI agent sandboxes: isolation, what the defaults do when an agent forgets, network access, GPUs and what 2,000 sandbox-hours cost.
Read the postgpu9 min read
A 70B model needs 40 to 141 GB for weights plus a KV cache to serve, and 50 GB to 1.1 TB to fine-tune. The math, GPU setups and a script to check yours.
Read the posttraining9 min read
Nodus vs Modal for GPU training: listed rates, preemption, the 24-hour limit, multi-node clusters, agent support and what the same jobs cost on each.
Read the postagents7 min read
A prompt is not a limit. Cap every run, put a blocking budget around agent work, scope its credentials and approve writes. Setup for Claude Code and Codex.
Read the postbenchmarks8 min read
Both platforms reduced perplexity by 21.8% and produced identical weights. Our pilot compares what that improvement cost and how long delivery took.
Read the postbenchmarks8 min read
Nodus and Modal reached 91.74% accuracy with identical trained weights. We compare successful-run charges, retry costs and delivery time.
Read the postcapacity6 min read
Spot GPUs cost up to 90% less but can vanish with 30 seconds of notice. What breaks, each cloud's notice window, the cost math and a safe setup.
Read the posttraining8 min read
Modal alternatives for GPU training compared on H100 price, preemption, run limits and multi-node scale, with the cost of one 80 GPU-hour run worked out.
Read the postpricing3 min read
Listed per GPU-hour prices for B300, B200, H200, H100, A100, L40S, L4 and RTX cards as of October 8, 2026, with a training-run cost example.
Read the postmcp3 min read
Connect one MCP server and your coding agent can estimate, launch and watch GPU jobs on your account, with dry runs and spending limits.
Read the postcheckpointing3 min read
Save model, optimizer and step to one directory, write atomically, resume on start, and let the platform carry that directory across a reclaim.
Read the postA higher overall score can hide the loss of familiar capabilities. Use a paired retention test to decide whether a fine-tuned model is ready.
Compare Nodus and AWS SageMaker for training: checkpoint ownership, total run cost, migration work and when staying in AWS makes more sense.
A random row split can put the same question in training and validation. Choose the holdout unit that matches the claim you want to test.
A higher agent pass rate can hide fewer completed tasks. Compare scored pass rate, scoring coverage and confirmed successes before ranking two evaluations.
Name the model, data, stop rule, dollar cap and outputs in one prompt, and Claude Code can fine-tune on a cloud GPU. The prompt, the manifest and what to check.
Nodus vs E2B for AI agent sandboxes: isolation, what the defaults do when an agent forgets, network access, GPUs and what 2,000 sandbox-hours cost.
A 70B model needs 40 to 141 GB for weights plus a KV cache to serve, and 50 GB to 1.1 TB to fine-tune. The math, GPU setups and a script to check yours.
Nodus vs Modal for GPU training: listed rates, preemption, the 24-hour limit, multi-node clusters, agent support and what the same jobs cost on each.
Both platforms reduced perplexity by 21.8% and produced identical weights. Our pilot compares what that improvement cost and how long delivery took.
Nodus and Modal reached 91.74% accuracy with identical trained weights. We compare successful-run charges, retry costs and delivery time.
A prompt is not a limit. Cap every run, put a blocking budget around agent work, scope its credentials and approve writes. Setup for Claude Code and Codex.
Spot GPUs cost up to 90% less but can vanish with 30 seconds of notice. What breaks, each cloud's notice window, the cost math and a safe setup.
Modal alternatives for GPU training compared on H100 price, preemption, run limits and multi-node scale, with the cost of one 80 GPU-hour run worked out.
Listed per GPU-hour prices for B300, B200, H200, H100, A100, L40S, L4 and RTX cards as of October 8, 2026, with a training-run cost example.
Connect one MCP server and your coding agent can estimate, launch and watch GPU jobs on your account, with dry runs and spending limits.
Save model, optimizer and step to one directory, write atomically, resume on start, and let the platform carry that directory across a reclaim.